Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Date: 2021-06-11 16:34:38
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:39:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I suspect "an historic" is bordering on archaic even in the UK these days.

Don't trigger me on the difference between "historic" and "historical"! ;-)

(Hey, not every day I get to trim quoted text to one line --- see recent
pgsql-general discussion of the topic.)

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-06-11 17:15:11 Re: Question about StartLogicalReplication() error path
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2021-06-11 16:27:57 Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()