| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
| Cc: | tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Duplicate history file? |
| Date: | 2021-06-11 02:28:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20210611.112845.1860170166600493845.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Recently my brain is always twisted..
At Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:25:51 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Anyway it doesn't seem to be the time to do that, but as now that we
- know that there's a case where the current example doesn't prevent PG
+ know that there's a case where the current example prevents PG
> from working correctly, we cannot use the "test ! -f" example and
> cannot suggest "do not overwrite existing archived files" without a
> caveat. At least don't we need to *fix* that parts for now?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-06-11 02:38:16 | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-06-11 02:25:51 | Re: Duplicate history file? |