| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
| Date: | 2021-06-09 02:17:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20210609021735.doepevxigys7ucar@nol |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> test deadlock-simple ... ok 20 ms
> test deadlock-hard ... ok 10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft ... ok 147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2 ... ok 5154 ms
> test deadlock-parallel ... ok 132 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok 553 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok 234 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok 2389 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok 1876 ms
>
> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?
No objection, as the output is still way under 80 characters.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-09 02:21:52 | Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-06-09 01:57:45 | Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names |