Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
Date: 2021-05-28 13:42:24
Message-ID: 202105281342.gzoeegkm5hvm@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> >> as mentioned in [1], I have created an implementation of command
> >> counter statistics very similar in purpose to the one already
> >> pending in the commitfest going by the name "pg_stat_sql". I don't
> >> really care if this implementation is seen as building on that one
> >> or as separate, but I was worried about hijacking that thread, so
> >> I'm starting this thead. There are elements of this patch that
> >> borrowed from that one, so if this is accepted, authorship should
> >> reflect that.

Hello, was this abandoned or is there another thread somewhere? The
patch in the email I'm replying to doesn't apply, but the conflicts
don't look very bad.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2021-05-28 13:53:06 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-28 13:35:38 Re: storing an explicit nonce