Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns
Date: 2021-05-27 23:25:01
Message-ID: 202105272325.h54h52kyjjyz@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Mar-15, Etsuro Fujita wrote:

> (2019/03/04 12:10), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > (2019/03/02 3:57), Andres Freund wrote:
> > > FWIW, I pushed the EPQ patch, doing this conversion blindly. It'd be
> > > awesome if you'd check that it actually works...
> >
> > I'll start the work later this week. I think I can post an (initial)
> > report on that next week, maybe.
>
> Here is an updated version of the patch [1].

What happened to this patch? Seems it was forgotten ...

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-05-28 00:52:59 Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of HOT in Postgres 14
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-27 22:53:50 Re: Replacing pg_depend PIN entries with a fixed range check