Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?
Date: 2021-05-11 17:22:11
Message-ID: 20210511172211.v7ihthznkdv6y4jf@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-05-11 11:44:22 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Why would we? It's only used in Windows builds, and there's no VPATH
> there (sadly).

Is that really relevant? We'll need to update the file on any platform
when modifying the .sed, not just in windows.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-05-11 17:25:00 Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-05-11 17:21:15 Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?