From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Date: | 2021-05-11 01:58:01 |
Message-ID: | 20210511015801.GM6088@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:35:28PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Thanks for making the updates.
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 05:07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:52:44PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > > > Improve the performance of parallel sequential scans (Thomas Munro, David Rowley)
> > >
> > > I think it is worth mentioning "I/O" before "performance". This
> > > change won't really help cases if all the table's pages are already in
> > > shared buffers.
> >
> > I went with:
> >
> > Improve the performance of parallel sequential I/O scans (Thomas Munro,
> > David Rowley)
>
> I think I'd have gone with:
>
> "Improve I/O performance of parallel sequential scans (Thomas Munro,
> David Rowley)"
>
> The operation we're speeding up is called sequential scan. We don't
> have any operation that's named sequential I/O scan.
OK, new text:
<listitem>
<!--
Author: David Rowley <drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2020-07-26 [56788d215] Allocate consecutive blocks during parallel seqscans
-->
<para>
Improve the I/O performance of parallel sequential scans (Thomas Munro, David Rowley)
</para>
<para>
This was done by allocating blocks in groups to parallel workers.
</para>
</listitem>
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-05-11 01:59:25 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-05-11 01:56:45 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |