Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Date: 2021-05-06 07:23:02
Message-ID: 20210506.162302.1971507615008478616.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 4 May 2021 10:07:51 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:27 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On 2021-05-03 16:49:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > But perhaps we could work around this by allowing pgarch.c to access
> > > shared memory, in which case it could examine the current timeline
> > > whenever it wants, and probably also whatever LSNs it needs to know
> > > what's safe to archive.
> >
> > FWIW, the shared memory stats patch implies doing that, since the
> > archiver reports stats.
>
> Are you planning to commit that for v15? If so, will it be early in
> the cycle, do you think?

FWIW It's already done for v14 individually.

Author: Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Mon Mar 15 13:13:14 2021 +0900

Make archiver process an auxiliary process.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com 2021-05-06 07:26:29 RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2021-05-06 07:04:44 Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby