Re: Use simplehash.h instead of dynahash in SMgr

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use simplehash.h instead of dynahash in SMgr
Date: 2021-04-30 17:36:22
Message-ID: 20210430173622.GA5453@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David,

You're probably aware of this, but just to make it explicit: Jakub
Wartak was testing performance of recovery, and one of the bottlenecks
he found in some of his cases was dynahash as used by SMgr. It seems
quite possible that this work would benefit some of his test workloads.
He last posted about it here:

https://postgr.es/m/VI1PR0701MB69608CBCE44D80857E59572EF6CA0@VI1PR0701MB6960.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com

though the fraction of dynahash-from-SMgr is not as high there as in
some of other reports I saw.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2021-04-30 17:37:26 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-04-30 17:35:24 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs