Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2021-04-28 19:49:47
Message-ID: 20210428194947.GA6772@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pushed that now, with a one-line addition to the docs that only one
partition can be marked detached.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"That sort of implies that there are Emacs keystrokes which aren't obscure.
I've been using it daily for 2 years now and have yet to discover any key
sequence which makes any sense." (Paul Thomas)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-04-28 19:51:27 Re: Better sanity checking for message length words
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-04-28 18:40:09 Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"