Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style
Date: 2021-04-14 02:08:27
Message-ID: 20210414020827.GA1232417@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:26:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Attached are some draft patches to convert almost all of the
> contrib modules' SQL functions to use SQL-standard function bodies.
> The point of this is to remove the residual search_path security
> hazards that we couldn't fix in commits 7eeb1d986 et al. Since
> a SQL-style function body is fully parsed at creation time,
> its object references are not subject to capture by the run-time
> search path.

Are there any inexact matches in those function/operator calls? Will that
matter more or less than it does today?

> However I think we may still need an assumption that earthdistance
> and cube are in the same schema --- any comments on that?

That part doesn't change, indeed.

> I'd like to propose squeezing these changes into v14, even though
> we're past feature freeze. Reason one is that this is less a
> new feature than a security fix; reason two is that this provides
> some non-artificial test coverage for the SQL-function-body feature.

Dogfooding like this is good. What about the SQL-language functions that
initdb creates?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-04-14 02:21:55 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-04-14 01:50:09 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings