Re: SQL-standard function body

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Finally, 0003 might be a bit controversial: it changes the stored
> prosrc for new-style SQL functions to be the query text of the CREATE
> FUNCTION command. The main argument I can see being made against this
> is that it'll bloat the pg_proc entry. But I think that that's
> not a terribly reasonable concern

Such storage cost should be acceptable, but ...

> The real value of 0003 of course would be to get an error cursor at
> runtime

A key benefit of $SUBJECT is the function body following DDL renames:

create table foo ();
insert into foo default values;
create function count_it() returns int begin atomic return (select count(*) from foo); end;
select count_it();
insert into foo default values;
alter table foo rename to some_new_long_table_name;
select count_it(); -- still works

After the rename, any stored prosrc is obsolete. To show accurate error
cursors, deparse prosqlbody and use that in place of prosrc.