Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2021-04-08 01:50:17
Message-ID: 20210408015017.yb2tb324y6zt4o66@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Hi,

On 2021-04-08 13:33:18 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 11:06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> >
> > > Might be force_parallel_mode=regress related.
> >
> > Yeah. On my machine, it's fine without force_parallel_mode and
> > crashes with that. Looks like query text is not getting passed
> > to the parallel worker in some cases.
>
> I wonder if it would be worth adding a regression test run of the core
> tests during make check-world with force_parallel_mode set to regress.
>
> But maybe people running the tests on slow machines might not be a fan
> of that idea.

I've wondered about that too. Perhaps we could reuse the pg_upgrade run?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-08 02:11:52 Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-04-08 01:33:18 Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body