Re: wal stats questions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com
Subject: Re: wal stats questions
Date: 2021-03-26 17:07:45
Message-ID: 20210326170745.rk3tj7hzqaklheix@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-03-25 16:37:10 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> On the other hand, the counters are incremented in XLogInsertRecord()
> and I think we don't want add instructions there.

I don't really buy this. Setting a boolean to true, in a cacheline
you're already touching, isn't that much compared to all the other stuff
in there. The branch to check if wal stats timing etc is enabled is much
more expensive. I think we should just set a boolean to true and leave
it at that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-03-26 17:11:25 Re: make the stats collector shutdown without writing the statsfiles if the immediate shutdown is requested.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-03-26 16:52:24 Re: invalid data in file backup_label problem on windows