Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Date: 2021-03-24 03:07:13
Message-ID: 20210324030713.5qduplsbz32bfzf3@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:27:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> No, I was thinking of just doing a single commit. Should I do three
> commits? I posted it as three patches since that is how it was posted
> by the author, and reviewing is easier. It also will need a catversion
> bump.

Yes, I originally split the commit because it was easier to write this way and
it seemed better to send different patches too to ease review.

I think that it would make sense to commit the first patch separately, but I'm
fine with a single commit if you prefer.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-24 03:08:13 Re: Add client connection check during the execution of the query
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-03-24 03:02:39 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?