Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

On 2021-Mar-23, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> FWIW there's yet another difference between the current BRIN opclass
> definition, compared to what CREATE OPERATOR CLASS would do. Or more
> precisely, how we'd define opfamily for the cross-type cases (integer,
> float and timestamp cases).
>
> AFAICS we don't really need pg_amproc entries for the cross-type cases,
> we just need the operators, so pg_amproc entries like
>
> { amprocfamily => 'brin/datetime_minmax_ops', amproclefttype =>
> 'timestamptz',
> amprocrighttype => 'timestamp', amprocnum => '1',
> amproc => 'brin_minmax_opcinfo' },
>
> are unnecessary. The attached patch cleans that up, without breaking any
> regression tests. Or is there a reason why we need those?

... ooh ...

When you say "just the operators" you mean the pg_amop entries, right?

I think I agree -- cross-type amproc entries are unlikely to have any
use.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile