Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2021-03-23 15:25:23
Message-ID: 20210323152523.GA9721@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm coming around to the idea that the fact that you can cancel the wait
phase of DETACH CONCURRENTLY creates quite a disaster, and it's not easy
to get away from it. The idea that REPEATABLE READ mode means that you
now see detached partitions as if they were in normal condition, is
completely at odds with that behavior.

I think a possible solution to this problem is that the "detach" flag in
pg_inherits is not a boolean anymore, but an Xid (or maybe two Xids).
Not sure exactly which Xid(s) yet, and I'm not sure what are the exact
rules, but the Xid becomes a marker that indicates an horizon past which
the partition is no longer visible. Then, REPEATABLE READ can see the
partition, but only if its snapshot is older than the Xid.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"La persona que no quería pecar / estaba obligada a sentarse
en duras y empinadas sillas / desprovistas, por cierto
de blandos atenuantes" (Patricio Vogel)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-03-23 15:29:24 Re: [CLOBBER_CACHE]Server crashed with segfault 11 while executing clusterdb
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-03-23 15:13:56 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages