Re: BUG #16160: Minor memory leak in case of starting postgres server with SSL encryption

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, duspensky(at)ya(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16160: Minor memory leak in case of starting postgres server with SSL encryption
Date: 2021-03-20 00:07:32
Message-ID: 20210320000732.zaq227u5spnhwytr@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

On 2021-03-16 14:44:55 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> OOMs errors should be gracefully handled and PG should continue to
> function. Was that not the case..?

Depends on what you mean with graceful. Unless you restart the database
you'll eventually not be able to do anything anymore, since even the
smallest memory allocation will fail?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-03-20 00:08:24 Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-03-19 23:56:45 Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files