|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>|
|Cc:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Key management with tests|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:37:43PM -0300, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Mar-18, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > This is discussed in src/backend/access/transam/README, specifically the
> > section that talks about Skipping WAL for New RelFileNode. Basically,
> > it's the 'wal_level=minimal' optimization which allows WAL to be
> > skipped.
> Hmm ... that talks about WAL-skipping *changes*, not WAL-skipping
> *relations*. I thought WAL-skipping meant unlogged relations, but
> I understand now that that's unrelated. In the transam/README, WAL-skip
> means a change in a transaction in a relfilenode that, if rolled back,
> would disappear; and I'm not sure I understand how the code is handling
> the case that a relation is under that condition.
> This caught my attention because a comment says "encryption does not
> support WAL-skipped relations", but there's no direct change to the
> definition of RelFileNodeSkippingWAL() to account for that. Perhaps I
> am just overlooking something, since I'm just skimming anyway.
First, thanks for looking at these patches --- I know it isn't easy.
Second, you are right that I equated WAL-skipping relfilenodes with
relations, and this was wrong. I have updated the attached patch to use
the term WAL-skipping "relfilenodes", and checked the rest of the
patches for any incorrect 'skipping' term, but didn't find any.
If "WAL-skipping relfilenodes" is not clear enough, we should probably
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2021-03-18 18:59:00||Re: Key management with tests|
|Previous Message||Peter Geoghegan||2021-03-18 18:36:41||Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies|