Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu(dot)garrigues(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2021-03-16 20:00:40
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2021-03-05 21:35:59 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'll take the weekend to think about the issue with conn->last_query and
> conn->queryclass that I mentioned yesterday; other than that detail my
> feeling is that this is committable, so I'll be looking at getting this
> pushed early next weeks, barring opinions from others.

It is *very* exciting to see this being merged. Thanks for all the work
to all that contributed!


Andres Freund

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-03-16 21:08:27 Re: Boundary value check in lazy_tid_reaped()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-03-16 19:54:40 Re: shared-memory based stats collector