Re: Optimising latch signals

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimising latch signals
Date: 2021-03-08 23:20:47
Message-ID: 20210308232047.GA3188@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Mar-03, Thomas Munro wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:29 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Time to watch the buildfarm to find out if my speculation about
> > illumos is correct...
>
> I just heard that damselfly's host has been decommissioned with no
> immediate plan for a replacement. That was the last of the
> Solaris-family animals testing master. It may be some time before I
> find out if my assumptions broke something on that OS...

Hi, I don't know if you realized but we have two new Illumos members
now (haddock and hake), and they're both failing initdb on signalfd()
problems.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-03-08 23:22:31 Re: cursor sensitivity misunderstanding
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-03-08 23:14:19 Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update