Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Date: 2021-03-05 08:00:41
Message-ID: 20210305.170041.1908036130555046657.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(Sorry for my slippery fingers.)

At Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:07:06 +0500, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote in
> Maybe it's offtopic here, but anyway...
> While working on "lz4 for FPIs" I've noticed that this test fails with wal_compression = on.
> I did not investigate the case at that moment, but I think that it would be good to run recovery regression tests with compression too.
>
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

The problem records have 15 pages of FPIs. The reduction of their
size may prevent WAL-buffer wrap around and wal writes. If no wal is
written the test fails.

regrds.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takashi Menjo 2021-03-05 08:08:46 Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-03-05 07:57:40 Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails