Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Matthieu Garrigues <matthieu(dot)garrigues(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date: 2021-02-16 16:27:50
Message-ID: 20210216162750.GA13534@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Feb-16, Craig Ringer wrote:

> FWIW I'm also thinking of revising the docs to mostly use the term
> "pipeline" instead of "batch". Use "pipelining and batching" in the chapter
> topic, and mention "batch" in the index, and add a para that explains how
> to run batches on top of pipelining, but otherwise use the term "pipeline"
> not "batch".

Hmm, this is a good point. It means I have a lot of API renaming to do.
I'll get on it now and come back with a proposal.

Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2021-02-16 16:31:11 Re: Tid scan improvements
Previous Message chenhj 2021-02-16 15:15:36 Re: [Proposal] Page Compression for OLTP