From: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which partition scheme makes sense for my time based IoT-datagrams? |
Date: | 2021-02-11 14:03:41 |
Message-ID: | 20210211140341.GB1603@hjp.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2021-02-10 16:09:30 +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I have a table storing datagrams from some IoT-devices, with one
> datagram per device per day most likely for around 75'000 devices
> currently. I want to test query performance with a partitioned table
> and am interested in the following queries mostly:
>
> * querying arbitrary datagrams by their ID
> * querying datagrams being X old based on some timestamp
> * 15 minutes
If you get one datagram per day, how it is useful to query all datagrams
received in the last 15 minutes? That's either a random sample (if
devices report at random times) or empty (if they all report at midnight
and it isn't just after midnight).
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brajendra Pratap | 2021-02-11 15:19:58 | Re: Unable to execute Query in parallel for partitioned table |
Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2021-02-11 13:51:54 | Re: SV: Insertion time is very high for inserting data in postgres |