Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination
Date: 2021-01-24 16:01:33
Message-ID: 20210124160133.GA32557@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Jan-24, Julien Rouhaud wrote:

> + /*
> + * Do not allow tuples with invalid combinations of hint bits to be placed
> + * on a page. These combinations are detected as corruption by the
> + * contrib/amcheck logic, so if you disable one or both of these
> + * assertions, make corresponding changes there.
> + */
> + Assert(!((tuple->t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY) &&
> + (tuple->t_data->t_infomask2 & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED)));
>
>
> I attach a simple self contained script to reproduce the problem, the last
> UPDATE triggering the Assert.
>
> I'm not really familiar with this part of the code, so it's not exactly clear
> to me if some logic is missing in compute_new_xmax_infomask() /
> heap_prepare_insert(), or if this should actually be an allowed combination of
> hint bit.

Hmm, it's probably a bug in compute_new_xmax_infomask. I don't think
the combination is sensible.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"There is evil in the world. There are dark, awful things. Occasionally, we get
a glimpse of them. But there are dark corners; horrors almost impossible to
imagine... even in our worst nightmares." (Van Helsing, Dracula A.D. 1972)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mahendra Singh Thalor 2021-01-24 16:06:43 Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2021-01-24 13:20:58 Re: mkid reference