| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com |
| Cc: | osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation |
| Date: | 2021-01-08 08:52:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20210108.175221.1020658670277126419.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:47:05 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> This version RelationChangePersistence() is changed not to choose
> in-place method for indexes other than btree. It seems to be usable
> with all kind of indexes other than Gist, but at the mement it applies
> only to btrees.
>
> 1: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZEZ5RONS49C7mEpjhjndqMQtVrz_LCQUkpRWdmRevDnQ@mail.gmail.com
Hmm. This is not wroking correctly. I'll repost after fixint that.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-01-08 08:54:10 | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-01-08 08:26:56 | Re: Proposal: Global Index |