Re: range_agg

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2020-12-27 18:07:51
Message-ID: 20201227180750.GH13234@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 09:53:13AM -0800, Zhihong Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is not an ideal way to index multirages, but something we can
> easily have.

What sort of indexing improvements do you have in mind?

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-12-27 19:07:29 Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2020-12-27 17:53:13 Re: range_agg