| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, Paul Guo <guopa(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts |
| Date: | 2020-12-25 02:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20201225023958.GW30237@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 05:48:42AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I'm not posting the updated 0002 to 0004 patches, I plan to do so
> after a couple of reviews happen on the design of the APIs in 0001.
>
> Thoughts?
Are you familiar with this work ?
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2717/
Reloptions for table access methods
It seems like that can be relevant for your patch, and I think some of what
your patch needs might be provided by AM opts.
It's difficult to generalize AMs when we have only one, but your use-case might
be a concrete example which would help to answer some questions on the other
thread.
@Jeff: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2871/
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-12-25 03:03:57 | Re: A failure of standby to follow timeline switch |
| Previous Message | Tang, Haiying | 2020-12-25 02:23:21 | RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |