Re: Proposed patch for key managment

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: 2020-12-19 20:22:34
Message-ID: 20201219202234.GJ28841@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:58:37AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> My final point is that we can find ways to do what you are suggesting as
> an addition to what we are adding now. What we need is clear
> justification of why these additional features are needed. Requiring
> the use of a true random number generator is a valid argument, but we
> need to figure out, once this is implemented, who really wants that, and
> how to implement it cleanly.

I added a comment to this script to explain how to generate a true
random passphrase, attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

Attachment Content-Type Size
pass_fd.sh application/x-sh 782 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-12-19 20:35:28 Re: Weird special case in jsonb_concat()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-12-19 20:11:05 Re: v10 release notes for extended stats