Re: Proposed patch for key managment

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: 2020-12-05 02:08:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 04:38:14PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If most people approve of this general approach, and the design
> decisions made, I would like to apply this in the next few weeks, but
> this brings complications. The syntax added by this commit might not
> provide a useful feature until PG 15, so how do we hide it from users.
> I was thinking of not applying the doc changes (or commenting them out)
> and commenting out the --help output.

Here is an updated patch to handle the new hash API introduced by
commit 87ae9691d2.

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

Attachment Content-Type Size
key.diff.gz application/gzip 24.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-05 02:22:12 Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-12-05 02:04:35 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?