Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol
Date: 2020-12-02 20:16:30
Message-ID: 20201202201630.GD20285@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:16:31AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 23:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > As I said before, it is more raw bytes, but
> > we
> > don't have an SQL data type for that.
>
> Sorry to jump in to this thread late.
>
> Can't we just set both "filename" and "content" to be BYTEA, but then
> set the format code to 1 (indicating binary)?
>
> For clients that do look at the descriptor, they are more likely to get
> it right; and for clients that don't look at the descriptor, there will
> be no change.

Yes, we could, but I thought the format code was not something we set at
this level. Looking at byteasend() it is true it just sends the bytes.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-12-02 20:26:22 Re: Add docs stub for recovery.conf
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-12-02 20:03:28 Re: Add table access method as an option to pgbench