Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round
Date: 2020-12-01 20:08:10
Message-ID: 20201201200810.fk5llimb55jm633z@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-12-01 21:04:44 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Andres investigated a few days ago, managed to reproduce the issue locally,
> and has one line patch. I'm unsure if it should be prevently back-patched,
> though.

I see no reason not to backpatch - it's more correct for past versions
of LLVM as well.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-12-01 20:16:05 Re: proposal: unescape_text function
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-12-01 20:04:44 Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round