| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup |
| Date: | 2020-11-22 11:11:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20201122111121.GA23947@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 09:39:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> So, what you are basically saying is to switch currtid_byreloid() to
>> become a function local to tid.c. And then have just
>> currtid_byrelname() and currtid_for_view() call that, right?
>
> Yeah, that sounds about right.
Okay, here you go with the attached. If there are any other comments,
please feel free.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| currtid-remove-v4.patch | text/x-diff | 13.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Florent | 2020-11-22 12:50:55 | Parallel plans and "union all" subquery |
| Previous Message | Gilles Darold | 2020-11-22 10:05:52 | Re: Issue with server side statement-level rollback |