| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup |
| Date: | 2020-11-22 02:09:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20201122020932.GA1651@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility,
> I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks
> breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice
> any improved ease-of-use.
So, what you are basically saying is to switch currtid_byreloid() to
become a function local to tid.c. And then have just
currtid_byrelname() and currtid_for_view() call that, right?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Fan | 2020-11-22 02:29:21 | Re: Different results between PostgreSQL and Oracle for "for update" statement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-21 23:27:12 | Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index |