Re: Tab complete for CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER statement

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSI)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tab complete for CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER statement
Date: 2020-11-18 05:06:56
Message-ID: 20201118050656.GK19692@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:14:10PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> I don't think that this is a requirement for this thread, though.
>
> Agreed, I'm not trying to block this patch. Just wishing
> there were a better way.

Okay. I have tweaked a couple of things in the patch and applied it.
I am wondering if libreadline gives the possibility to implement an
optional grouping of words to complete, but diving into its
documentation I have not found something that we could use.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-11-18 05:10:31 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-18 04:40:21 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions