On 2020-11-02 11:03:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> While looking at the parallel copy patches, it started to annoy me how large
> copy.c is.
> There isn't much common code between COPY FROM and COPY TO, so I propose
> that we split copy.c into two: copyfrom.c and copyto.c. See attached. I thin
> that's much nicer.
Not quite convinced that's the right split - or perhaps there's just
more potential. My feeling is that splitting out all the DML related
code would make the code considerably easier to read.