Re: Would it be helpful for share the patch merge result from cfbot

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Would it be helpful for share the patch merge result from cfbot
Date: 2020-10-23 02:10:30
Message-ID: 20201023021030.GM1475@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:05:34AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> It seems to me that this problem is not completely related to the CF
> bot, no? Automated testing and fetching from a mirror repository
> that's automated to fetch patches from the mailing list and apply them
> on some custom branches looks like something entirely independent to
> me. Saying that, having something like that may be nice to have,
> assuming that we also find a way to track in this repo patches that
> are not able to apply correctly, meaning that we could forcibly apply
> the patches with the conflicts included in what's committed in the
> test branch. In terms of my own experience as CFM, I don't think that
> this would be really helpful for the CF manager, but for reviewers or
> newcomers, that could help in getting involved into the CF.

Please forget that, I just noticed Thomas' replies.

/me hides
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-10-23 02:11:24 Re: speed up unicode decomposition and recomposition
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2020-10-23 02:06:08 Re: proposal: function pg_setting_value_split() to parse shared_preload_libraries etc.