Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Date: 2020-10-22 14:25:48
Message-ID: 20201022142548.GA8832@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Oct-22, Amit Langote wrote:

> 0001 fixes a thinko of the recent commit 1375422c782 that I discovered
> when debugging a problem with 0003.

Hmm, how hard is it to produce a test case that fails because of this
problem?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-22 14:28:24 Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2020-10-22 14:20:49 Re: Is Recovery actually paused?