Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date: 2020-10-12 14:02:38
Message-ID: 20201012140238.lb3hoxfwvmmmlaix@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 02:28:43PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
>> ...
>
>I have worked on this patch, so as discussed now I am maintaining the
>preserved compression methods using dependency. Still PRESERVE ALL
>syntax is not supported, I will work on that part.
>

Cool, I'll take a look. What's your opinion on doing it this way? Do you
think it's cleaner / more elegant, or is it something contrary to what
the dependencies are meant to do?

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-10-12 14:14:45 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-10-12 13:47:33 Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c