Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
Date: 2020-10-06 15:22:11
Message-ID: 20201006152211.GC3686@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 11:06:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Hm, does it matter? I think those wrappers send the output to /dev/null
> >> anyway.
>
> > The debian ones don't, because they consider it useful information to the
> > user. I'd say that it is, especially in the case of pg_upgrade. (Less so
> > about initdb, but still a bit -- especially when creating secondary
> > clusters)
> > The redhat ones I believe sent it to a logfile, not to /dev/null. Meaning
> > it's not in your face, but it still contains incorrect instructions.
>
> OK. FWIW, I'd vote for separate --no-instructions and --no-scripts
> switches.

Works for me.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2020-10-06 15:29:29 Re: Yet another fast GiST build
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-10-06 15:20:39 Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)