| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? |
| Date: | 2020-10-06 05:02:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20201006050050.GB32280@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> (Also, did we decide _not_ to make the pg_stat_statements queryid
> always a positive value?)
This specific point has been discussed a couple of years ago, please
see cff440d and its related thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobG_Kp4cBKFmsznUAaM1GWW6hhRNiZC0KjRMOOeYnz5Yw@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-10-06 05:04:57 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-10-06 04:38:23 | Re: 回复：how to create index concurrently on partitioned table |