| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Date: | 2020-10-01 04:37:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20201001043729.GI8130@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:38:19PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I changed my mind to attach the benchmark patch as .txt file,
> expecting the checkers not picking up it as a part of the patchset.
>
> I have in the precise performance measurement mode for a long time,
> but I think it's settled. I'd like to return to normal mode and
> explain this patch.
Looking at the CF bot, this patch set does not compile properly.
Could you look at that?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-10-01 04:38:41 | Re: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-10-01 04:35:41 | Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size |