Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
Date: 2020-10-01 04:32:20
Message-ID: 20201001043220.GG8130@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:20:56PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have been working away at this and have updated the patches for many
> cosmetic and some functional improvements.

Please note that this patch set fails to apply. Could you provide a
rebase please?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-10-01 04:35:21 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Previous Message tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com 2020-10-01 04:20:27 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist