Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Date: 2020-10-01 03:56:02
Message-ID: 20201001035602.GE8130@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:16:53AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thanks. Since it starts all remote nodes before local ones, the
> startup gain would be the shorter of the startup time of the fastest
> remote and the time required for all local nodes. Plus remote
> transfer gets asynchronous fetch gain.

The patch fails to apply per the CF bot. For now, I have moved it to
next CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2020-10-01 03:56:28 Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-10-01 03:50:39 Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY