Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net
Subject: Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size
Date: 2020-09-28 02:54:16
Message-ID: 20200928.115416.175989928927733297.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:11:23 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> One other thing that occurred to me today is can't we keep this as
> part of PgStat_GlobalStats? We can use pg_stat_reset_shared('wal'); to
> reset it. It seems to me this is a cluster-wide stats and somewhat
> similar to some of the other stats we maintain there.

I like that direction, but PgStat_GlobalStats is actually
PgStat_BgWriterStats and cleard by a RESET_BGWRITER message.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2020-09-28 03:14:27 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Peter Smith 2020-09-28 02:51:40 Re: Load TIME fields - proposed performance improvement