Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class
Date: 2020-09-24 05:00:10
Message-ID: 20200924050010.GO28585@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:11:06PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Adding a TOAST can cause circular dependencies between those relations?? If
> you don't mind can you explain more about it?

The difficult task here is to make sure that we don't have any corner
cases that begin to break because of those additions:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180719235006.5oqjjscmp3nxjfne@alap3.anarazel.de
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-09-24 05:08:44 Re: The ultimate extension hook.
Previous Message btnakamichin 2020-09-24 04:54:27 Re: Feature improvement for pg_stat_statements