| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
| Date: | 2020-09-24 03:34:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20200924033407.GC28585@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 06:26:49PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> The attached patch is Tom's patch from this thread from March last
> year minus his regression test changes plus my join surcharge stuff.
> This is just intended as a topic of conversation at the moment and
> does not make any adjustments to the expected test outputs.
So, this patch has been moved across 7 successive CFs already. Tom,
you are registered as a reviewer of this patch. Do we have any plans
to move this forward? Or, as this thread is now idle for months,
should it be just RwF or such?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-24 04:06:31 | Re: BUG #15383: Join Filter cost estimation problem in 10.5 |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-09-23 20:49:12 | Re: BUG #16624: Query Optimizer - Performance bug related to predicate simplification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 03:39:46 | Re: Avoiding hash join batch explosions with extreme skew and weird stats |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-24 03:29:38 | Re: Display individual query in pg_stat_activity |