On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:00:04PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The attached removes it in favor of using palloc() et.al directly. Is there
> any reason to keep it around still?
I doubt that anybody has been compiling with PX_OWN_ALLOC in the last
years, so let's remove this abstraction. And +1 for your patch.
--
Michael