Re: Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto
Date: 2020-09-23 07:57:44
Message-ID: 20200923075744.GB7405@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:00:04PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The attached removes it in favor of using palloc() et.al directly. Is there
> any reason to keep it around still?

I doubt that anybody has been compiling with PX_OWN_ALLOC in the last
years, so let's remove this abstraction. And +1 for your patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Katsuragi Yuta 2020-09-23 08:13:36 Re: [PATCH] Add features to pg_stat_statements
Previous Message k.jamison@fujitsu.com 2020-09-23 07:57:33 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist