Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats)
Date: 2020-09-18 05:55:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:03:55AM -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Yes, I have prioritized a couple other patches over this one, with
> benchmarking this patch lower down my priority list. Thank you,
> Michael, for the reminder!

Based on the low level of activity and the fact that the patch was
marked as waiting on author for a couple of weeks, it looks like
little could be achieved by the end of the CF, and the attention was
elsewhere, so it looked better (and it still does IMO) to give more
attention to the remaining 170~ patches that are still lying on the CF

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-18 06:10:11 Re: Concurrency issue in pg_rewind
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-18 03:43:09 Re: track_planning causing performance regression