From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Command statistics system (cmdstats) |
Date: | 2020-09-18 05:55:43 |
Message-ID: | 20200918055543.GA2772@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:03:55AM -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Yes, I have prioritized a couple other patches over this one, with
> benchmarking this patch lower down my priority list. Thank you,
> Michael, for the reminder!
Based on the low level of activity and the fact that the patch was
marked as waiting on author for a couple of weeks, it looks like
little could be achieved by the end of the CF, and the attention was
elsewhere, so it looked better (and it still does IMO) to give more
attention to the remaining 170~ patches that are still lying on the CF
app.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-18 06:10:11 | Re: Concurrency issue in pg_rewind |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-18 03:43:09 | Re: track_planning causing performance regression |