From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Date: | 2020-09-17 04:44:48 |
Message-ID: | 20200917044448.GE2873@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:52:27PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> and some natural behaviour - any special case with different behaviour is a
> bad thing generally.
Please note that v33 of the patch fails to apply, speaking of at least
0001. Could you provide a rebase?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-17 04:46:53 | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-17 04:33:29 | Re: [patch] Fix checksum verification in base backups for zero page headers |